This “Occupy” Movement Baffles Me

I’ve been paying as little attention this movement as possible because it reminds me of the 2003 mass whining about the war in Iraq which as we see 8 years and 2 administrations later had absolutely zero effect on anything, because why would it?

My father-in-law tipped me off to a tumblr page about this nonsense.  Apparently they’re now calling themselves the “99%”.  According to the sidebar on this page, “We are getting nothing while the other 1 percent is getting everything.”  I don’t even know where to start with these people.  I think the images speak for themselves.  Read a couple, you’ll see what I’m talking about.

I’ll tell you some of the things that the 99% are getting.  A comfortable suburban existence, a car, a digital camera, an internet connection, TV, enough food to make them fat, cigarettes, liquor, and enough free time to whine about all of this on the internet.

I mean, seriously guys, that’s a pretty remarkable definition of nothing.

Each and every one of these protesters who are busy blocking traffic in major U.S. cities lives better than about 5 billion other human beings.  If you count how many people who have ever lived, which have been estimated at 100 billion, then you live better than 99 billion other human beings have ever lived.

What the fuck are you complaining about?!!

I swear to God, if there were ever an effigy to the entitlement culture these protests would be it.  These assholes have the luxury of sitting around on the street with signs and posters – in other words, not working – and they’re still going home to a warm place to live and still have plenty of food in their bellies.  Even if these protesters literally had no other material possessions, they’re still well off.  But the fact that we even know about these people is due largely to the fact that while they stand in the street and complain that they don’t have anything they are busy tweeting with their iPhones.  I’m gainfully employed, by the way, and I don’t have a smart phone because I think they’re overpriced and a data plan would put an unnecessary financial strain on my family.  Actually, it wouldn’t strain my family at all; I’m just cheap.

But back to the point, these people, despite these luxuries – and let’s face it, that’s what they are – are still whining because a very small number of people in the world have managed through some means to become astronomically wealthy?  I’d like to point out that almost every person who is super rich today is super rich by the fruits of their own labors, not because they were born into it: Ellison, Gates, Jobs, Slim, Obama, to name a few.  I got a bachelor’s degree and yet somehow I don’t feel as though I am entitled to a 200 foot private yacht.  If I were to listen to these protestors it seems I may conclude that I need my bumps felt.

But okay, fine.  Let’s shelve these obvious arguments for a minute.  One of the prevailing themes among these protestors is the “American dream.”  Note the operative word dream.  As I understand it this phrase came about to describe the idyllic lifestyle sought by returning G.I.’s after World War 2.  Since then, it has apparently transmogrified into meaning, “if you manage to get a diploma in any field from any university, you are automatically rewarded with a job that pays 6 figures and the accompanying privileged SWPL lifestyle.”  Seriously, I can’t tell you how many of these tumblr pictures are hand-scrawled notes about people whining about how their college degrees cost them enormous sums of money and they have not seen any return on their investments.  I don’t need to tell you – just look for yourself.  The tumblr is filled with them.  Here’s one:

It really makes me wonder what these children’s parents said them as they were growing up.  I constantly here phrases from this movement like, “I was told that if I got a good education I would live the dream and have a good life” and variants thereof.  When they say, “I was told” I must ask by whom?

It’s no secret that from the minute my generation was born our parents, and everyone else’s parents, essentially every adult, heaped upon us this notion that we must go to college.  At my high school, virtually entirely white, something like 96% of the graduating class went to some form of college.  96% of them did not graduate from college, of course.  But at least they tried.  Part of the reason that high schools go along with this is because it would be incredibly difficult for them to teach us anything if there weren’t some good reason to learn the crap they’re teaching.  Our transcripts were viewed in high school as our golden ticket to college, which we were assured would lead to a good, comfortable life.  This meant that we had to get good grades in high school or our transcript would be crap and we would never get into college.

And the same tired crap was repeated to us in college as well.  “If you don’t get good grades,” they warned, “no employer will want to hire you out of college because your college transcript shows you were a slacker.”

Well, that turned out to be a giant lie, at least in my experience.  I graduated from college with a 2.9.  I earned 112 credits in my first two years (you can do the math on how many credits per semester that was).  It then took me 2 years to earn the remaining 8.  When I interviewed for my first job, the subject of grades didn’t come up.  In fact, the guy who interviewed me never even saw my transcript because generally, interviewers don’t.  The evil corporation which hired me needed proof of my college degree (because they don’t hire people who don’t have degrees), but the only person who ever saw that proof was an HR drone.  We didn’t talk about my course work.  We didn’t talk about my grades.

But back to the parent thing, my parents told me from the day that I was born that there is no such thing as the “American dream” and that you are what you earn and that if you make decisions for yourself based on the world as you want it to be instead of the world as it actually is, you’re going to find yourself poor and unhappy.  If I had followed my “dream”, my life would be drastically different than it is today.  There’s even a chance that I would be out there in the rain carrying a sign whining about evil corporations.

Instead, I’m writing this blog post from the comfort of my home on my lunch break (for which I am getting paid by an evil corporation because I’m salaried, and salary is grand) because, as my parents instructed me, I took a pragmatic approach to life.  I made sure to make decisions that would ensure my basic needs are covered first.

When I was in college, I minored in anthropology because I enjoyed it.  I might have majored in it.  The reason that I didn’t is because my parents were paying my tuition and they would have stopped if I majored in something that would not translate into gainful employment.  My parents viewed college as an investment, not as a 4 year vacation after high school.

It would be incredibly disingenuous of me to sit here and claim that I got to where I am now – namely dry, inside, and not whining about a job I don’t have – without the guidance of my parents.  They gave me good advice, and I followed it.  I am strong-headed and stubborn and I probably would not have followed it if there weren’t some financial incentive to follow it.  I am pretty sure I wouldn’t have graduated from college otherwise.

A lot of you will immediately say, “oh, well, easy for him to say, mommy and daddy paid for his tuition!”  Well, let me tell you what my parents did.  They made me take out loans for school.  They promised me that they would pay them back if I graduated and if I graduated with a major that they approved.  (English was not one of the options.  Neither was anthropology).  This had two effects: first, it motivated me to actually graduate because I didn’t want to be saddled with debt (and an inability to pay it back, since graduating college and almost graduating college are two very different things).  Second, when they did pay my school debt off for me, it made me glow in the dark in the eyes of creditors: here’s a 22-year-old kid who just paid back thousands and thousands of dollars of student loans.  I started my life with a credit rating of almost 750.  My first credit card had a $17,000 limit on it (which my income at the time did not justify).

I’m where I am today largely because my parents were smart and told me the right things when I was growing up.  I never entertained these illusions that if I just went to college and majored in anything I wanted that there would be someone somwhere offering me a cushy high-paying job doing exactly what I love.  I viewed college as an investment because that’s how my parents taught me to view it, and I viewed getting a job after college as requiring some type of skillset that I had to develop – and no, critical reading of 19th century literature is not a skillset that employers want.  My dad always told me that I had to have some market value.  My skills had to be able to translate into money for someone or I would never make any.  Nobody pays English majors to write short fiction stories.  So I didn’t major in English.

My dad also warned me not to major in something that everybody else on the planet majors in.  English is the most common major in the country.  Have you ever heard the phrase “supply and demand?”  There is almost zero demand for English majors and there’s an overwhelming supply of them being churned out of expensive universities year over year.  Because of these two simple, well-known facts, I put two and two together and realized that it would be very stupid to major in English, so I didn’t.

And now, 10 years later, I am not marching in the streets because I don’t have anything to complain about.  And I bet I do a lot more writing, just here on this blog, than almost every English major in the country.  I am also willing to bet that the things I write are read by far more people than almost anything the typical English major has ever written.

So, to come back to the main point of this post, a question to these “occupy”-ers:

Why are you protesting corporations?  Why Wall Street?

It seems to me that these people are not protesting corporations per se.  They’re protesting the fact that these same corporations did not gift wrap a high paying job for these unemployed people and present it on a silver platter.  The message that I hear from these people is incredibly incoherent – I can’t find a single example of something they’re actually proposing; no concrete change to the system that could be reasonably implemented.  It’s like a discorded chorus of, “Rich people shouldn’t be so rich.  They should share it with me so I can buy a yacht too!”  Jealousy has been around forever and it will never go away.

If the employment rate was 1% and these corporations were giving “living wage” jobs to everybody off the streets, there wouldn’t be any protests.  We know this because during the 90′s when unemployment was closer to 5%, which is probably about the lowest it’s ever going to get because about 1 in 20 people are just patently unemployable, there weren’t marches in the streets.  There wouldn’t be any protests because these people would be at their wage slave jobs, but also because they, like me, would not have anything to complain about.

The reason that these people are protesting evil corporations and Wall Street is because the majority of them are unwilling to blame the man they elected.  I’m certain that if Bush were still president we’d see a lot more anti-Bush posters in the crowds.  They’d still whine about corporations, certainly – that’s an age-old favorite.  But I’m hearing a lot of noise from these people about how they’ve lost all their hope and feel “disenfranchised” in the past 2 years.  In other words, the man they elected to bring Hope and Change to the country has instead made them feel totally hopeless and “disenfranchised.”  They’ll still reelect him in 2012 because they’re idiots, but that’s another discussion altogether.  As an aside, “disenfranchise” was one of my dad’s favorite phrases to mock.  Any time he made me do something I didn’t want to do, and I complained, he would ask me satirically if I was feeling disenfranchised.  This taught me not to complain.

What the great many of these people should be protesting is not Wall Street.  You can’t blame these guys for taking bailouts from the government.  Remember: the government invented the phrase “too big too fail” and were the ones handing out the money.  Granted, the occupy movement seems to imply that government and Wall Street is one big good ole’ boys club which looks out for each other (i.e., the collective plutocracy) and that is certainly true, but neither Wall Street nor the federal government is to blame for your current life situation.

You should be protesting two groups:

First, protest your parents and the way you were raised!

The “American dream” has not become some kind of impossible thing because of Wall Street or Barack Obama or Bush or Congress.  It’s become impossible because you were fed lies your entire life and you believed them, and nobody was around to show you how deep the rabbit hole goes.  You were told that all you needed to do is buy an expensive (mostly useless) education - the pricier, the better – and you would have it made for life.  This is America, not Japan.  Couldn’t you have figured out that college educations aren’t reserved for an elite few these days?  Couldn’t you have figured out that a college educated 20-something is a dime a dozen these days and the supply is rapidly outpacing the demand?  Well, I guess you couldn’t.  That’s probably also why you think it’s a good idea to sit around on Wall Street with signs as if anyone is going to notice or care.

I’ll tell you what’s going to happen: after a few more weeks of this, people are going to get bored.  Winter’s coming.  It’s going to get cold.  The fad will pass, nothing will change, nobody will care, and the phrase “Occupy Wall Street” will be a Jeopardy answer five years from now and once in awhile someone will make an edit to its Wikipedia page.

Second, protest the institution of higher education in America!

I know that student debt and degrees not equaling jobs is only one aspect of these protests – plenty of middle aged people are whining about their lack of employment also, but this is the one I want to focus on because by and large it’s the single biggest problem that is plaguing young people today.

The problem with America’s economy is the lack of unskilled labor jobs.  It’s all being outsourced to other countries.  My sister’s roommate at her expensive presitgious private university earned an illustrious double major in English and Philosophy.  She once scoffed at my sister for majoring in pre-med, saying, “College is about learning.  You shouldn’t go to a university just to get a job.  That’s what trade schools are for!”  After summarily destroying her roommate on the GMATs my sister went on to grad school and to a comfortable high-paying job in the medical field.  Her roommate got a job as a telemarketer in a call center and tried to commit suicide 2 or 3 times post-college (and failed).  Too bad she didn’t major in pre-med; she’d have succeeded for sure if she understood anatomy and physiology.

There aren’t many telemarketing jobs left in the United States.  They’re staffed with English majors.  That’s because English majors are unskilled labor.

The giant lie that our culture and the money-grubbing universities tell you is that if you get a college degree, it will somehow help you and be worth the investment.  The truth is that the vast majority of degrees that are awarded year after year are frankly not worth the paper they are written on, but they cost $100,000 or more to attain.  You come out of school only slightly more employable than you were without one, and you’re also saddled with crushing debt.  You’re in the same labor pool as people who didn’t go to college and there just aren’t that many jobs out there for people without very specific, desirable skills. 

Thus, college grads are forced to take jobs that they consider to be beneath them and are therefore extremely unsatisfied and malcontent, and that’s why they’re marching in the streets.  They don’t want to stock shelves in a grocery store.  They have a college degree!   I remember reading somewhere that something like 40% of doormen in New York have 4 year degrees.  I didn’t know studying the collected works of William Shakespeare was a prerequisite for opening and closing doors for hotel guests, but apparently it is.

That’s what you should be protesting.

Protest the fact that you were told lies.  Protest the fact that colleges are charging you an arm and a leg for a degree that does not pay for itself.  Protest the fact that a university will charge you $100,000 for an English degree that is worth nothing.  Imagine if any other corporation – yes, private universities are for-profit corporations – charged you $100,000 for a commodity that had no value.  You could sue them, right?

Or is it just caveat emptor?

All that said, I still empathize with these protestors, but not for the reasons behind the cause they’re championing.

If I were protesting anything, I would protest the fact that our economy is rapidly reaching a point where the average American is not smart or skilled enough to participate in it.

I work in a technical field.  I’m a software developer.  An engineer.  I am good at math, and I can do things that lots of people can’t.  That’s why I get paid good money.  It’s a highly intellectual pursuit and humbly speaking, most people are simply not smart enough to do what I do.  I was born with my gifts, so in that sense, I am lucky.

In the old days, such as the world my parents were born into, there were tons of manufacturing jobs in the U.S. and even if you were not very sharp in the head, you could still make a decent living for your family (decent by their standards.  Your 1950′s line worker at GM would not protest in the street because he couldn’t afford an iPad, but today’s line worker will).  Nowadays, those jobs just don’t exist.  The skill requirements for virtually every job that pays well enough for the typical suburban white person raised by baby boomers to take without marching in the streets about how shitty it is are getting higher and higher, and thus excluding more and more people.

There is no solution to this problem.

We’re at critical mass.  The only thing we can do is wait.

I honestly believe that one day, all of the demands of these Occupy protesters will actually be met – a living wage will be provided to every person regardless of whether they are working or not – but only because we will replace all of our unskilled labor jobs which form the basis of our economy with robots.  When robots are growing, harvesting, processing and preparing all of our food with little human intervention, and when robots are building our homes, paving our roads, felling our timber, and manufacturing our furniture, when robots are building our cars and our computers and mowing our grass and cleaning our sewers, then we’ll see the living wage.  When time stops equaling money, then we’ll get there.

But for now, it’s just not possible for so many reasons.  If one person isn’t working, then someone else needs to work twice as hard (or, in money terms, produce twice as much value).  That’s asking an awful lot.  The Occupy people are looking at these super rich CEO types, who “produce” many thousands of times the living wage and could therefore subsidize with their fortunes, in theory, thousands of people.  That’s short sighted.  If they sat down with a paper and pencil and worked out how few very rich people there are vs. how many “poor” people there are, it just doesn’t work.  Plus, the number of rich people would go down because nobody would aspire to become rich if they know their efforts are just going to go to someone else who isn’t working.  That’s why communism failed – hard working successful people are not known for their generosity.  Look at your hero, Steve Jobs.  That man didn’t contribute even a penny of his billions to any type of charity.   He could have handed out iPads for free to every single one of the Occupy protestors and barely felt it, but he didn’t.  What makes you think he’s going to give anyone a living wage?

Ultimately, what will happen is that every country’s economy will catch up to where America’s is – nobody will want to do unskilled labor because it doesn’t pay enough.  Right now, we outsource our manufacturing to China and we insource our lawn care jobs to Mexican immigrants.  Eventually we’ll run out of poor 3rd world people to dump our low paying jobs on.  In my industry we’ve already seen it.  In the good old days, you could get 10 Indians for the cost of 1 American.  Now you can get 1.5, or maybe 3 if you hire cheap young grads with no experience, so we moved to China.  In only 5 years we’ve seen the same thing – they’re getting more and more expensive.  That’s happening everywhere.

But the world is a big place and there are lots and lots of poor people.  Eventually, as I said, we’ll run out of those people.  I believe that we’ll see robot automation out of both natural technical progression and out of necessity long before we run out of cheap unskilled labor from other countries, and then we’ll begin to see true socialism because it will actually work.

I have no problem with socialism’s principles, but I don’t condone robbing Peter to pay Paul.

If Peter is a robot, I don’t care.  As long as some person – rich, poor, or otherwise – in order to finance some kind of global living wage isn’t forced to work harder or give up what they’ve rightfully earned according to the rules of fair economy (e.g., supply and demand), then I think it’s a great idea.  It will have consequences, for sure, but bearable ones.

Ultimately, these protests are just too soon.  The utopia they envision can’t happen yet.  I believe we will begin to see it take shape in our lifetimes, but it’s 25 to 50 years off.  I suspect that my grandchildren will grow up in a vastly different world – one in which you really can go to university and major in anything you want just because it interests you and for its own sake, and you can pursue whatever endeavor you want without regard to how much money it will make you because you can live comfortably on a free living wage.  I wish I were born into a world with that opportunity and I wish that I could make it happen right now, but I am a realist and I understand the way the world is and I understand what we need to get to where the Occupy-ers want to go, and I know it can’t happen yet.   Money will become something nobody really worries about, and will be seen as a luxury rather than a necessity.

But that’s the future.  As for the problems of right now – you’re wasting your breath.  Go home and try to get a job.  And throw Obama out in 2012, please, seriously.

8 comments so far

  1. Anonymous on

    Your post makes it seem like you may not know that Steve Job’s died on the 5th.

  2. Chuck on

    I don’t blame them, really… I would like to see good white kids from suburban homes whose parents invested in their futures actually end up with a high-paying job. I hardly see how it is wallst’s fault or any “capitalist” they claim to presently despise, but it does suck that so much was wasted on them. It actually saddens my very soul to know that these middle-class kids are claiming equality with poor mexicans and blacks that have never had anything to do with their lives. Hopefully they get their act together and find something concrete to attack.

  3. Faye on

    On that tumblr page, one of the “99%” says that she’s $50,000 in debt but give most of her money towards rescuing animals. When you can’t manage your money properly and make unwise spending decisions, it’s not Wall St.’s fault.

  4. Anonymous on

    So here is a link with some very useful information about what the protests are about. http://www.businessinsider.com/what-wall-street-protesters-are-so-angry-about-2011-10?op=1

  5. Evan on

    So what about a massive federal investment to get all these people skilled and able to compete in the modern workforce? It would obviously add hugely to deficit, but the long term benefits for America would be immeasurable. However, I don’t think our currently corrupted political system would support it, and Wall St/corporate America is deeply intertwined in that corruption, so OWS does have a point and is raising awareness. The debate is changing and that’s a good thing. Our federal govt needs to be the “employer of last resort” FDR style. Why pay people welfare/unemployment for doing nothing when we could be training them to succeed in the 21st century?

    • emach on

      The fundamental flaw in this thinking is that you can train anyone to do anything. Most of the country is not fit to do anything other than the types of blue collar jobs they used to be able to get in this country, or the finite number of air conditioned no-pressure non-skilled office jobs that about 80% of college educated girls find in places like the government sector and corporate HR departments.

      Spending money “training” these people is not going to grow the economy.

      • Chuck on

        Very true.

  6. BldrRepublican on

    I could not agree with you more, but I think you missed one additional group of people these protesters should be protesting – themselves. I say this because these protestors were stupid enough to believe everything they heard. When the colleges and fellow liberal-arts majors told them about the “abundance of jobs for English majors”, they should have had the common sense to pick up the newspaper and look for a job that requires an English major, if only to corroborate what they heard (you know, verifying the information from an independent source).

    They didn’t. Now there are just pissed that they were too stupid back then and want to blame someone or something else for it.

    For the record, I too am a software engineer and had a similar experience with my parents while going to college, except that mine merely shrugged and turned their pockets inside out when I asked for money. That forced me to not only take out a shitload of loans, but to make sure I chose a field with some ROI – computer science. My first choice was Architecture – you know – sitting around in a swanky high-rise office making mockups of shopping centers, complete with pedestrians and street vendors, while enjoying three-martini lunches on a regular basis.

    When I graduated, I had $40,000 worth of debt (adjusted for inflation that’s near $70,000 now), and had to drive my 15yr old 4cyl POS hatchback for 5 years longer while my coworkers were buying new Mustangs and Hondas. For a while, I even had to live at home (paying substantial rent) while I paid off the rest of my loans. Try getting a date with a professional woman driving something like that while living at home with mommy …..

    But like you, that’s called making pragmatic decisions and thinking beyond the end of your nose. Eventually it all paid off (figuratively and literally), and I now have a comfortable house high up on a hill.

    I have no sympathy whatsoever for these OWS protestors. They’re rampant here in Boulder, CO, as you can imagine. They’re STILL camped out on the lawn of the municipal building in downtown, and none of them look like the kind of person I’d even consider hiring, if even to empty my trash. While I am certainly not in the top 1% of the US income-wise, (heck, I’m not even in the top 25%), I seem to associate myself with the 1% with regards to these lazy morons. I think even the massive liberals here are getting sick of them. They’re making complete fools of themselves with their overt jealousy.

    Keep up the good work-


Agree with me here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.